Case Studies

Evidence, worked through.

Quantified outcomes from forensic delay analysis, EOT assessment and digital schedule assurance — the methodology behind the numbers, with confidentiality preserved.

Forensic Delay Analysis · EOT
291 → 64
days · claimed to approved

291 Days Claimed, 64 Days Approved

How a 291-day Extension of Time claim was tested event by event against the contemporaneous record, and resolved to a defensible 64 days — a figure the Engineer and an independent specialist each reached within a few days.

Read the case study → Forensic Delay Analysis
426 → 91
days · position reduced on the evidence

426 Days Reduced to 91

Forensic review of a 426-day EOT position — programme analysis, critical-path cause and effect, and the evidence that settled it at 91 days.

Read the case study → Digital Project Controls · Schedule Assurance
25% → 83%
contractor schedule conformance

Schedule Quality: 25% to 83%

How automated, rules-based schedule assurance lifted contractor programme quality from a quarter to over four-fifths conformance — and kept it there.

Read the case study → Project Controls Leadership
16 → 1
contracts · unified to one controls standard

One Controls Standard, 16 Contracts

Leading the planning function across a city-scale programme — 16 contracts, 12 senior planners, one standard that made the whole programme governable.

Read the case study → Project Controls · Programme Governance
AED 21B
flagship programme · integrated controls

AED 21B Hudayriyat West

Leading integrated project controls across a flagship AED 21B island-development programme — one defensible view of time, cost, risk and performance.

Read the case study →